Being vegetarian or vegan is nothing extraordinary, what is difficult is to take the step to have the energy, strength of character to stand out from the current majority and fulfill the daily difficulties associated with their choice. The difficulties are not, contrary to what many may think of non-vegetarians, finding a balance in the vegetarian or vegan diet. Being vegetarian or vegan is very simple that way. The problem is rather live in a society where nothing is suitable for us, where vegetarianism and veganism are a minority and are not always well tolerated. The texts that constitute this brochure are intended to share with you (or, you know) our point of view.
The first chapter, where we expose the reasons for our choices, will appear, perhaps, some who continue to eat meat, as being excessive. The goal is not to assault charge but give you the energy to stand out from the mass of humanity to move towards vegetarianism or veganism. Unfortunately, to challenge the ideas and habits that we have given our parents and society, we must address these points, perhaps annoy omnivores: we would prefer to do otherwise, but how? Maybe should we not feel targeted as a person we just denounce the mechanisms and ideas that make human use of animals for food?
[...] While consumption of meat is it, producing catastrophic pollution, and even considering methods of food production craft, those that are less polluting ones are vegan. Animal feces, which are defined as "natural", represent a dramatic pollution when they are in large quantity. So why the "ecologists" do they not prefer a vegan? Their logic variable geometry fits well with what gives them the least concerned. For them, it is that humans continue to exercise its authority over all animals in the slaying. [...]
[...] It's easy to feel better about ourselves by buying ready his piece of meat and seeking by every means not to see the implications of their purchase. It's easy to lament his fate and be unable to make any effort not to abuse the weak. Sorry, but I do not want to live the killing and trade bodies. Give birth to creatures raise and care as if they were her children and then kill them to feed their bodies, it is degrading to him who does it. [...]
[...] An animal is not an object, but a conscious being, and eating meat is not an act without consequences for others. If one person hurts another person, nothing can justify not give a collective response to prevent it. However, everyone can move forward we have, we also ate meat. We try to respect each person, but this does not prevent us from finding that eating meat is an act of cruelty. "The human is not superior to other animals because it is unlike any other and is the only one who can do certain things (make and create complex products, for example)? [...]
[...] His jaws short, medium strength, his dog of the same length as its other teeth, and molars tuberous does not allow him to chew the grass or eat meat without preparing these foods through cooking. Its organs are formed in accordance with the provisions of its teeth. His stomach is simple and his gut is moderately long and very well anchored in his large intestine. Alexander Von Humboldt (1769-1859), German naturalist, explorer and geographer, conducted studies on magnetism and supported the theory of the origin of igneous rocks. [...]
[...] It was his followers who in good conscience, and without monsters as they can, moreover, to show solidarity with the people they have been taught to respect (their children, problems in humans), perpetuate the belief without ask questions. It is easy to see what is wrong with the culture of peoples which we do not. It is less easy to know when to step back from the practice of his own society. It may very well perform the worst horrors without the slightest feeling of making a barbarous act, without trying to be mean and can be, moreover, someone kind, considerate of other points. [...]
APA Style reference
For your bibliographyOnline reading
with our online readerContent validated
by our reading committee
