On a summer day of June 1959, during the wars of Italian unification, a major battle broke out in northern Italy. Later to become known as the battle of Solferino, it was estimated that some six thousand were killed in a single day. Henry Dunant, a citizen of Geneva, Switzerland, was traveling through the region to meet with Napoleon III regarding business matters. Upon arrival in the small village of Castiglione, Dunant was horrified by the site of the thousands who had been wounded in the battle and taken refuge. The Franco-Sardinian forces had completely inadequate medical services to attend the injured. Dunant remained in the village for the next three days, helping the wounded soldiers by delivering food and water and dressing their wounds. After assisting the soldiers for several days, he traveled back to Geneva to focus on his business duties. Nevertheless, he was unable to forget the memories of his experience in Castiglione. He decided to publish a book entitled, A Memory of Solferino, where he described the battle and neglected state he found the soldiers. He ended his text with two proposal-type questions: "Would it not be possible in the time of peace and quiet, to form relief societies for the purposes of having care given to the wounded in wartime by zealous, devoted and thoroughly qualified volunteers?" He then went to suggest "some international principle, sanctioned by a convention and inviolate in character, which one agreed upon and ratified, might constitute the basis for societies for the relief of the wounded in the different European countries."
[...] Additional Protocols 1 and 2 As the guardian of international humanitarian law, the International Committee of the Red Cross is responsible for its development in order to adjust to changes in warfare. In 1965, the ICRC made the decision to reevaluate the Geneva Conventions of 1949 in terms of their necessity to protect victims of modern military conflicts[14]. Thus, the ICRC began researching the possibilities to fill the gaps in the existing law, by providing the Conventions with Additional Protocol 1 and Additional Protocol 2. [...]
[...] Both Conventions protect medical assistance, particularly organizations such as the International Committee of the Red Cross, by insulating the hospitals, personnel and vehicles from the conflict. The relevant provisions of each Convention address each aspect of medical assistance. Anything used in the aid of the wounded and sick is to be immune from the conflict and failure to adhere is a violation of the convention. Commitments under the Conventions: All Party States are required to uphold the purpose of the treaty. [...]
[...] Francois Bugnion, The Role of the Red Cross in the Development of International Humanitarian Law: The International Committee of the Red Cross and the Development of International Humanitarian Law Chi. J. Int'l 191 (2004). J. Henry Dunant, A Memory of Solferino (ICRC 1986). Bugnion, supra note 1. Christian Koenig, Observer status for the International Committee of the Red Cross at the United Nations: A Legal Viewpoint Intl Rev Red Cross 37 (1991). Bugnion, supra note 1. Philippe Abplanalp, The International Conferences of the Red Cross as a Factor for the Development of International Humanitarian Law and the Cohesion of the International Red Cross and Red Crescent Movement Intl Rev Red Cross 520 (1995). [...]
[...] Similarly, Norway criticized Additional Protocol 2 because they believed that the humanitarian guarantees for individuals did not go beyond the provisions set forth in the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights.[21] Indeed, the major criticism of Protocol 2 as adopted is that its major components were already contained in the provisions of the ICCPR, from which no derogation could be made even in emergency, including internal armed conflict. Unfortunately, Additional Protocol's 1 and as adopted, do not reflect the concerns of the Norwegians. [...]
[...] The conclusion of the conference was the signing of the Geneva Convention for the Amelioration of the Condition of the Wounded in Armies in the Filed on August giving rise to the basics of modern international humanitarian law.[3] By the end of the year, the Convention's ten articles had been ratified by the countries of Denmark, Norway, Sweden, Spain, Italy, the Netherlands, France, Switzerland, Belgium, and the Grand Dutch of Baden. The principles set forth were that “wounded and sick combatants, to whatever nation they may belong, shall be collected and cared and providing protection for medical volunteers on the battlefield. [...]
APA Style reference
For your bibliographyOnline reading
with our online readerContent validated
by our reading committee