Bible, Suprem Court, society, justice, public administration, challenge, opportunities, federalism, governance
The U. S. Supreme Court has always played the role of a decisive figure in the conflict of power between the federal and state authorities. The Supreme Court is the apex court of the United States. By virtue of its role in legal interpretation, it defines the parameters of federalism as stated in the Constitution (Konisky & Nolette, 2022). This job entails defending the rights and interests of a state against the federal government and vice versa in cases of perceived encroachments on competing jurisdictions. Thus, it reaffirms the doctrine of federalism, which is an attribute of the American Political System (Haines & Sherwood, 2022). Therefore, Federalism helps to create a foundation for the separation of powers between the federal government and state governments, which are vital regarding the variety of power within states and a uniform policy within a single country.
[...] Supreme Court in Federalism The U. S. Supreme Court has always played the role of a decisive figure in the conflict of power between the federal and state authorities. The Supreme Court is the apex court of the United States. By virtue of its role in legal interpretation, it defines the parameters of federalism as stated in the Constitution (Konisky & Nolette, 2022). This job entails defending the rights and interests of a state against the federal government and vice versa in cases of perceived encroachments on competing jurisdictions. [...]
[...] The ruling thus offers both prospects and opportunities in regard to public administration for public administrators. They required that they integrate proper legal frameworks in the region concerning the handling of sports betting activities, which involved licensing and enforcement as well as consumer protections. For that reason, administrators had to consider some social problems, such as gambling dependency and consequences. The new industry had to contribute to state revenues and enhance the economy. The decision emphasized the fact that policy-making must be responsive to the dynamics of the chosen industry and that for the regulators to accomplish inter-agency cooperation better, more focus must be given to the different agencies. [...]
[...] In education, there is Coha, which is the federal education policy with the state and local objectives the public administrators have to deal with. Currently, the ESSA broadens the states' roles in the delivery of education standards and enrolment, but this means that states must follow administrative guidelines which create plans that fit the federal provisions. Despite the escalating demands and expectations locally and at the federal level, achieving the goal of meeting the educational needs of the populace requires creative planning, resource mobilization, and appraisal of program performance. [...]
[...] Neiman, P. U., Tsai, T. C., Bergmark, R. W., Ibrahim, A., Nathan, H., & Scott, J. W. (2021). The affordable care act at ten years: Evaluating the evidence and navigating an uncertain future. Journal of Surgical Research, 263(263), 102-109. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jss.2020.12.056 Olkowicz, J. (2020). Necessary and Convenient: The Effect of Commerce and Necessary & Proper Clause Jurisprudence on American Federalism. U. Cent. Fla. Dep't Legal Stud. [...]
[...] (2024). Fiscal Federalism in the Twenty-First Century. Annual Review of Economics. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-economics-081623-020713 Behnke, N., & Benz, A. (2020). Federalism and Constitutional Change. In Routledge Handbook of Comparative Constitutional Change (pp. 167-181). Routledge. Bishop, S. M. (2021). The Role of the Supreme Court in Shaping the Affordable Care Act. The Affordable Care Act as a National Experiment, 57-62. [...]
APA Style reference
For your bibliographyOnline reading
with our online readerContent validated
by our reading committee
