Assisted suicide, euthanasia, ethics, Diane Pretty vs UK, ECHR European Convention of Human Rignts
This document contains 18 short-answer questions on assisted suicide.
[...] : Asked for immunity for her husband from prosecution; request denied. 7. What did she do when the DPP refused? What was the legal basis for doing this? : Challenged refusal via judicial review; invoked the European Convention on Human Rights (ECHR). 8. How did British courts respond to her request? : Denied her request; upheld the law banning assisted dying. 9. What rights protected by the ECHR did Diane Pretty invoke when she took her case to the ECHR in Strasbourg? [...]
[...] Assisted suicide I. What does the law say about assisted suicide and euthanasia? 1. What is the difference between assisted dying, active euthanasia and passive euthanasia? : - Assisted dying: Providing means for someone to end their own life; - Active euthanasia: Actively causing death (e.g., lethal injection); - Passive euthanasia: Withholding life-extending treatment (legal since Bland case, 1993). 2. What is the legal status of assisted dying, active euthanasia and passive euthanasia in the UK? : - Assisted dying & active euthanasia: Illegal (Suicide Act 1961; considered murder/manslaughter); - Passive euthanasia: Legal if acting in the patient's best interest (Airedale NHS Trust v. [...]
[...] Attempts to legalise assisted dying in Parliament 15. What attempts have been made to legalize assisted dying through Parliament? : Numerous private members' bills (PMBs), e.g., Lord Falconer (2014), failed. 16. Why have they failed? : Lack of parliamentary time and government support for PMBs AND Contentious issue with divided opinions across parties. 17. What is the difference between a Private Member's Bill and a Public Bill? : PMB: Introduced by MPs/Peers outside government, less likely to pass. Public Bill: Backed by government, has more chances of being enacted. [...]
[...] What did the court decide? : Court rejected the "right to die" interpretation. 11. What were Diane's arguments concerning Article What were the UK's arguments? What did the court decide? : Court ruled suffering caused by illness is not state responsibility. 12. What did the court decide concerning Article : Recognized potential for inclusion of assisted dying under privacy, but justified UK's ban due to the protection of vulnerable people. 13. What did the court decide concerning Article 14? : No discrimination found in the ban. [...]
APA Style reference
For your bibliographyOnline reading
with our online readerContent validated
by our reading committee