"Since 1720, all the Nordic countries have remained minor powers on the international stage. As such, the Nordic states have had to adapt to the constraints that are usually beyond their control." This statement could summarize the geopolitical situation which has shaped the security policies of the Nordic countries for the last two centuries. However, it is too general, as it considers the Nordic states as one single entity, without drawing attention to the diversity of the region. Indeed, the Nordic countries, which comprise Norway, Sweden, Denmark, Finland and Iceland , neither have the same historical background nor the same geo-strategic situation. In fact, they can be classified into two categories: the former empires, Sweden and Denmark, and the former colonies, Finland, Norway and Iceland . Moreover, for centuries, the Nordic region was far from being the peaceful region that it is now: between 1563 and 1720. Denmark and Sweden struggled for regional hegemony and were involved in not less than seven wars. Actually, the 1814 Norwegian-Swedish war, which resulted in a Swedish victory, was the last war that took place between two Nordic countries, even though at the Norwegian independence in 1905, the use of military force was seriously considered (Nyhamar 2004: 228). However, even in the absence of any inter-Nordic war, the Nordic region, as the rest of Europe, was known, throughout the 20th century, wars and military threats, which only disappeared with the end of the Cold War in 1989. Indeed, since the beginning of the 1990s, war and even the potentiality of war seem to have left Western Europe for good, giving the "small" Nordic states an opportunity to shape their security policies not only according to constraints but also according to choice. Consequently, it seems legitimate to wonder whether the tendency of the security arrangements of the Nordic states has been existant since 1991 towards greater similarities or differences.
First, we will present the background information for the present security arrangements in the Nordic countries, by outlining the security policies they adopted until the end of the Cold War. Then we will assess the differences and similarities of their post-Cold War choices.
[...] In the post-Cold War period characterised by the emergence of unipolarity and the European reunification (and thus also the Nordic reunification), the security policies of the Nordic countries had evolved towards greater similarity, as they all adapted to the new paradigm, considering the use of military force no longer only a defence posture but also a policy instrument. However, the differences still dominate the similarities, and the cleavages between the Nordic countries' security policies may even have appeared more clearly since 2001, as they have had diverging views on burning issues such as the support to the USA in their anti-terror campaign and the military intervention in Iraq. [...]
[...] I The security policies of the Nordic countries until the end of the Cold War The security policies of the Nordic countries before the outbreak of the Cold War The key word of the foreign policy of the Nordic countries in the period stretching from the First World War to the outbreak of the Second World War was neutrality. However, it is important to distinguish Finland from the metropolitan Scandinavian states, as its foreign policy was primarily shaped by the Soviet threat. [...]
[...] “Security policies from Constraints to Choice”, in Heidar, Knut (ed.). Nordic Politics. Comparative Perspectives. p.228 Because of limited information available about Iceland, it will be mostly left out in the following developments. Because of Norway's status after 1814, it might be more correct to talk about the newly independent countries. See bellow Although Denmark has signed a non-aggression pact with Hitler in may 1939 This semi-neutrality involved mine laying on German request in the Sound in May 1940 and allowing Nazi troop transportation through Sweden to [...]
[...] The Security policy of the Nordic countries during the Cold war: the Nordic balance At the advent of the Cold War in the late 1940s, all four Nordic states, culturally Western and ideologically democratic, found themselves because of the geographical location on the strategic and cultural frontier between the two superpowers and their nascent blocs, on the ideological frontier between capitalism and communism. (Arter 1999: 263) Finland and Norway shared a physical border with the Soviet Union, while the division of Germany by 1948 brought the Soviet Union to within six miles of the Danish coast. [...]
[...] II The Nordic post-Cold War security choices: more similarity, however still outweighed by differences The end of the Cold war has made the security policies of the Nordic countries more similar The end of the Cold War has changed tremendously the structure of the international system. Before considering the security choices of the Nordic countries after the end of the Cold War, it is important to draw attention to the transformation of the structure of the international system that followed the fall of the Soviet Union, notably because the new post-Cold War environment that has impacted on how the Nordic countries have approached their security policies since the beginning of the 1990s. [...]
APA Style reference
For your bibliographyOnline reading
with our online readerContent validated
by our reading committee
