Intergovernmental administration, USA United States of America, federal grant, coordination, governance, cooperation, federal government, policy implementation, intergovernmental management, collaboration, interdependence
The dynamics of governance in the United States are mainly attributed to the federalism system, which the Constitution established, and hence power is divided between the federal government and the states, with each having different authority. As seen under this framework, intergovernmental administration is the most crucial tool for overcoming the complexity of governance, providing coordination, cooperation, and collaboration among the different levels of government (D'Andrea, 2017). Integrating federal, state, and municipal levels through intergovernmental administration means considering complex relationships, exchanges, and decision-making structures in policy implementation, direct service, and decision-making. Intergovernmental management extends its meaning to cooperative federalism, where entities at different levels synergize their administrations to take on communal challenges and meet communal objectives. Intergovernmental administration covers a wide range of activities, such as distributing federal grants and negotiation of intergovernmental agreements to build synergy among various stakeholders.
[...] Intergovernmental governance is an institutional mechanism that runs the complicated relationship of the federal, state and local governments. It helps to create a workable environment and promote a synergistic atmosphere that brings these different regimes together to tackle common problems and deliver public services efficiently. The system is flexible and sustains creativity but also complicates the inconsistency of policies and inequalities of resource distribution. What we see today is not just the persuasive power of intergovernmental collaborations in the face of such challenges but also the effectiveness of these organizations in terms of disaster response and transport infrastructure. [...]
[...] The present status of the intergovernmental administrative aspect of the U.S. appears to be a hybrid entity with benefits and shortcomings. On one side is the liberty of local governments and emphasis on innovation and adaptation to local dispositions, as they can choose policies and programs that best suit the local community. The decentralized governance can result in a more controlled and effective policy, as policymakers are nearer to the communities they serve and, therefore, better informed about the particular needs of the localities and the issues at stake (D'Andrea, 2017). [...]
[...] intergovernmental administration. A reform idea is to simplify and make unified rules and procedures across the different levels of government to lessen the administration's workload and enhance the acceptance of people with policy regulation. Such equipment might require federal control and supervision to ensure that the national priorities are attuned with the state and local policies while the innovativeness is accompanied by flexibility (Kapucu, 2017). Actions should be taken to increase the capacity and durability of the governmental bodies of State and local governments towards future challenges. [...]
[...] These arrangements can be either formal or informal. They may involve formal structures such as intercity councils, task forces, informal networks, and partnerships based on mutual benefits and shared interests that do not necessarily have a structure. Intergovernmental administration is also driven by legal parameters, including constitutional provisions and court decisions that set the tone for intergovernmental collaboration and define the role and rights of each level of government. The success of intergovernmental management rests on a few critical factors like trust, communication, and leadership. [...]
[...] The field of intergovernmental administration in transportation infrastructure development has been functioning quite well. The funds received from the federal transportation program are sent via diverse channels to the departments of state transportation, which forward them to the local governments for upkeeping of roads, bridges, and public transportation system improvements. Although this framework entails discussions and selection controversies on resource distribution and project development, the coordination among federal, state, and local offices significantly deals with transportation infrastructure at different governmental levels. [...]
APA Style reference
For your bibliographyOnline reading
with our online readerContent validated
by our reading committee
