Greenpeace, activism, media, environmental policy, pressure group, income
To consider the effectiveness of Greenpeace's actions, you need to understand that they involve major media campaigns and direct action to make the environmental cause known to everyone. Spectacular actions such as taking over a nuclear power station to denounce nuclear safety. In other words, Greenpeace uses the media to put pressure on political decision-makers. Finally, the monitoring of whaling boats in Japan and Iceland and the call for GMO-free organic farming have had positive consequences, as legislation has been introduced. So there is both an awareness and a desire to influence policy.
[...] Questions What does your pressure group try to achieve / focus on / fights for or against? Greenpeace as a pressure group tries through media action campaigns focuses on how to protect the environment in all its forms (fauna, flora) by trying to obtain binding global regulations and legislation in order to be able to preserve nature. How effective have their actions been recently? The success of an organization like Greenpeace was first of all to make the world aware of the interest of preserving the environment. [...]
[...] Despite this, there is no shortage of criticism. For example, the degree of radicalism of certain actions (sometimes illegal, such as entering a nuclear power station) or the lack of scientific seriousness. Finally, the proximity of certain industrial lobbies has been detected. Then, understanding what made the success of its operations by way of pressure against polluters of all kinds is above all related to its independence, particularly financial. Indeed, Greenpeace's only source of income comes from donations and legacies. [...]
[...] Today, therefore, it is a movement that counts to exert useful pressure on how to regulate the use of fossil resources or the use of nuclear energy. Finally, the issue of global warming has become a major concern at the political level. This means that the awareness campaigns of this organization have been a success. What could / should they improve? Greenpeace could perhaps improve its media image by no longer passing them off as "ecological terrorists". In this, they should position themselves as a useful pressure group alongside local political parties to participate in discussions that may lead to binding legislation. [...]
[...] 350-word text about how efficient these different actions have been To understand the political effectiveness of Greenpeace as a pressure group is to go back to its creation. In this, this organization was founded on September in Vancouver, Canada. A key part of the actions aims to build public pressure on politicians and corporations to change their environmentally damaging behaviors, especially with regard to species and climate protection. The activists have given themselves the motto: non-violent against environmental crimes. To consider the effectiveness of Greenpeace's actions, you need to understand that they involve major media campaigns and direct action to make the environmental cause known to everyone. [...]
APA Style reference
For your bibliographyOnline reading
with our online readerContent validated
by our reading committee