Political Institutions, USA United States of America, american foreign policy, middle east, diplomatic interests, political actor, political system, national security
In 2017, Trump stated in the National Security Strategy of the United States of America that the US "seeks a Middle East that is not a haven or breeding ground for jihadist terrorists, not dominated by any power hostile to the United States, and that contributes to a stable global energy market."
The United States has been present in the Middle East since 2001 and maintains an arduous foreign policy to defend democracy and the diplomatic interests of the United States. Donald Trump proves it well in his declaration, that the ambition of the United States in the Middle East is based on Washington's interests. But the recent withdrawal of troops from Afghanistan allowing the return of the Taliban whose policy goes against democratic values raises questions about the failure of the policy of the United States in the region and therefore on the future of foreign policy in the Middle East.
[...] Constitution grants him the power to conduct foreign policy (Article 2 of the Constitution). In practice, foreign policy is the result of a collaboration between the president, the members of his administration (the Secretary of State and the National Security Advisor in particular), and Congress. As the commander-in-chief of the US military, the President would have a central role in the decision to withdraw or not, the troops from the Middle East. The President would be responsible for setting the strategic direction of the US military and for making the final decision on any withdrawal. [...]
[...] This calculation must take into account different aspects. The factors that could influence the decision are security on the ground, the state of US relations with regional partners and adversaries, the effectiveness of US military and diplomatic efforts in the regions, and domestic pol considerations. So what are the costs - benefits calculations that should be made to decide on the retirement of the United States in the Middle East? On one hand, the cost should concern three aspects. The financial costs, U.S. [...]
[...] government, including empirical, historical, economic, and diplomatic data. [...]
[...] The decision on a potential US withdrawal from the Middle East will be made by the US executive branch. This must be done by agreement between the President and Congress. While taking into account public opinion, the potential consequences of either a withdrawal or staying, and a complete analysis of existing data on the results of U.S. foreign policy in the Middle East. The process must be long-term to ensure that it takes into account all the information available to the U.S. [...]
[...] More importantly, he can give the president information and analysis on international events, helps to develop foreign policy objectives and strategies, and serves as a key liaison with foreign governments and international organizations. Together, the military and diplomatic advisors provide the President with critical information and expertise to help shape U.S. policy on matters of national security and foreign policy. Furthermore, the president must take into account the role of the US intelligence assessment. This provides policymakers with information and analysis on various issues, including threats to national security, political and economic developments in foreign countries, and the intentions and capabilities of foreign actors. [...]
APA Style reference
For your bibliographyOnline reading
with our online readerContent validated
by our reading committee
