Political theorists have debated for centuries the responsibility of countries to protect the victims of humanitarian crises. Sine the earliest days of international law, Grotius, Kant and Vattel have attempted to strike a balance between realist interests and the duty to help those most in need: refugees. All three philosophers decided that countries faced with refugees on their borders have the moral obligation to help them because states control the good most intrinsic to the refugees' survival: a secure territory free of persecution. Centuries later, their thoughts were legalized through the 1951 Convention on Refugees. There, the United Nations declared that it was the moral responsibility for Nations to offer refuge for those forced out of their homelands, regardless of their involvement in the matter. Culpability was not considered a requisite to act, but simply having the power to aid the plight of innocents. The United Nations High Commission on Refugees states that in 2008 there are 9 million displaced persons in the world, driven into exile by violence in their home countries. Depending on geographical proximity to the crisis, nations have shouldered varying degrees of the burden.
[...] Why have American policies towards Iraqis been so lackluster that they have the opposite effect of those instituted during Vietnam: instead of offering a safe harbor, devising ways to keep them out? Part The Security Challenges Posed by Immigration Policy In the minds of Americans, the Iraqi War has changed the very nature of war. The War on Terror unofficially began on 9/11, with legal Muslim immigrants crashing a civilian plane into the World Trade Center. With that simple act, suddenly a nation of immigrants saw danger lurking in the prospect of every person seeking entry into the United States. [...]
[...] Refugee camps were not deemed adequate in dealing with the crisis laid down in Vietnam, and the same perils exist for Iraqi refugees today. Hugo Grotius acknowledged that Nation-states had a responsibility towards refugees, but put a contingency on resettlement: A permanent residence out not to be denied to foreigners who, expelled from their homes, are seeking a refuge, provided that they submit themselves to the established government and observe any regulations which are necessary to avoid strife.[20] Grotius states unequivocally that the refugee and the host country have a responsibility to each other, the state, to open its doors, and the refugee, to respects the laws and society of their host country. [...]
[...] “Failed Responsibility: Iraqi Refugees in Jordan, Syria and Lebanon.” International Crisis Group July November 2008. < http: cfm>. Gibney, Matthew. The Ethics and Politics of Asylum. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press Glanz, James. “Premier of Iraq Is Quietly Firing Fraud Monitors.” 17 Nov Nov 2008. < http:>. Iraq Body Count Nov 2008. Iraq Body Count Nov 2008. http://www.iraqbodycount.org/ “Iraqi Refugees: Perspectives on the U.S. Responsibility.” Pulitzer Center Sept Nov 2008. < http: refugees.html>. Ishay, Micheline. The Human Rights Reader. New York: Routledge Press “Jordan Tightens Iraqi Immigration.” BBC News Feb Nov 2008. [...]
[...] “Premier of Iraq Is Quietly Firing Fraud Monitors.” 17 Nov Nov 2008. < http:>. “Failed Responsibility: Iraqi Refugees in Jordan, Syria and Lebanon.” International Crisis Group July November 2008. < http: cfm>. “Failed Responsibility: Iraqi Refugees in Jordan, Syria and Lebanon.” “Jordan Tightens Iraqi Immigration.” BBC News Feb Nov 2008. < http:> Krizner, Doug. “Syria Filters Its Iraqi Immigration.” The Marketplace Sept Nov 2008.. [10]Viahos, Kelley. “Iraq Translators Face Closed Door U.S. Immigration Policy.” FOX News Online Feb Nov 2008. [...]
[...] is at war, it displays a marked departure from past policies that offered special mechanisms to help groups victimized by American policy. This is most obviously exemplified by the fall of Saigon in 1975 and America's swift response to the mass migration it spurred. The War on Terror has recast the rules dictating the behavior of a nation caught between national security and humanity. Terrorists are not easily identifiable, and can easily disguise themselves as innocent civilians. This creates major problems for immigration officials sifting through the thousands of applicants for entry into the United States. [...]
APA Style reference
For your bibliographyOnline reading
with our online readerContent validated
by our reading committee