Methodology, Philosophy, Public opinion
A philosophy essay is a properly philosophical exercise from the time when the thought is able, through a critical work on itself, by distancing, to examine his habits of thought. Public opinion, this is not what you give is what one asks. It only gives the for questioning. It is to move from a passive thought (opinions are received), active thinking that sorts it receives and accepts only what it can give a conceptual basis. By analysis of the subject, we must reach pose a particular problem. The essay will not be a general discussion on the notion of the program, but the examination of a particular problem.
It does not begin with "In this.." as if it was already known, it is brought. Instead of emphasizing the educational side of the exercise, you must erase it, and show it is to think a problem that requires thinking when we adopt a critical attitude vis-à-screws provided, which is disposed astonishment.
[...] It only gives the for questioning. It is to move from a passive thought (opinions are received), active thinking that sorts it receives and accepts only what it can give a conceptual basis. I. The analysis of the subject By analysis of the subject, we must reach pose a particular problem. The essay will not be a general discussion on the notion of the program, but the examination of a particular problem. Make an analysis of the terms of the subject: the work of conceptual distinction. [...]
[...] - Either solving the problem through a conceptual distinction. It is shown that I and II are not contradictory because they do not speak the same thing at the same point of view. The object in question is understood in several senses, and based on this sense, one can not say the same thing. - Either solving the problem through a conceptual distinction. It is shown that I and II are two wrong ways to address the problem, because we stuck to a misconception of the object. [...]
[...] Then do as much as steps necessary to establish the thesis that is the subject of the second part and to dissolve inconsistent thoughts that oppose it. Same instructions as I. C. Last paragraph: achievements and thesis statement. "We can therefore establish that . " I and II may be enough to set the terms of the resolution of a problem. However, depending on the subject and it raises the speculative capacity, a third party may be required to reflection, especially if it does a reflexive return to I and / or II above contradiction. V. [...]
[...] Introduction part. We start with a definition (or terms of the subject) or an example that guides the thinking side of the first design. The first orientation we state that will be examined. B. Development of the first orientation. General principle: Do as much as steps necessary to establish the thesis that is the subject of the first part and to dissolve inconsistent thoughts that oppose it. To do this, we mobilize at least a philosophical text: from its precise explanation, it explicitly identifies the arguments for the thesis and objections to show the inconsistency of the thoughts that oppose it. [...]
[...] The introduction It does not begin with "In this . " as if it was already known, it is brought. Instead of emphasizing the educational side of the exercise, you must erase it, and show it is to think a problem that requires thinking when we adopt a critical attitude vis-à-screws provided, which is disposed astonishment. A. First time: Move the subject. Depending on the area affected by the subject, choose an example (from the literature, film, art . - provided that the reference is derived from a classic) for its paradoxical nature or likely to raise eyebrows. [...]
APA Style reference
For your bibliographyOnline reading
with our online readerContent validated
by our reading committee