Transhumanism, symbol, meaning, future of society, means development, improvement, made of transhumanism, philosophers, people practising minimalism
Seen as the future of society by many scientists, transhumanism is nowadays something that we have a lot to discover. This image shows the symbol created for transhumanism. Its design has been thought; the ‘+' means development, an improvement, so humans can no longer bound to their nature to become more, the circle shows life, eternity, and wholesomeness, the blue colour shows peace, hope, positiveness.
[...] But then, we slowly started to turn this to something that could exceed human capacities, and I think that's the moment where the limit as been passed. Scientists are now thinking of having multiple limbs, being more intelligent For example, I find that transhumanism on the brain is something quite weird: we only know very little of his incredible abilities, some capacities that are given us by transhumanism may already be natural capacities of the brain that aren't discovered yet, this organ is really way more powerful than we think. [...]
[...] Transhumanism and his symbol/meaning: do you agree? Seen as the future of society by many scientists, transhumanism is nowadays something that we have a lot to discover. This image shows the symbol created for transhumanism. Its design has been thought; the ‘+' means development, an improvement, so humans can no longer bound to their nature to become more, the circle shows life, eternity, and wholesomeness, the blue colour shows peace, hope, positiveness. The objective goal of this symbol is to reassure people by presenting transhumanism as the future, as a way to peace and happiness but also as a hope for humanity that will lead us to immortality. [...]
[...] I want to show how I find that transhumanism goes against our access to happiness; so many philosophers, people practising minimalism, and searchers ended up finding what happiness really was, to content ourselves with what we already have. We can therefore find that this request to a powerful human race goes against this idea. And if we get there and become a powerful race like Dan Brown said – which isn't possible because we'll never be fully satisfied – we won't reach peace, neither happiness. In conclusion, for me, transhumanism could be something researchers can enjoy evolving, but in no way something to integrate in society, in everyday life, at the expense of our natural capacities and our happiness. [...]
APA Style reference
For your bibliographyOnline reading
with our online readerContent validated
by our reading committee