Within Southeast Asia there is a region called Burma. Throughout this region there is much suffering because of the war waged between the Myanmar Tatmadaw regime and the Democratic Karen Buddhist Party. The individuals who make up the Democratic Karen Buddhist Party are an ethnic assembly who refuse the beliefs and actions of the Myanmar regime. This culture is conducting itself in warfare because of the purpose of seeking a reduction of government control and a more reasonable treatment for their people.
The Myanmar regime is raping the Democratic Karen Buddhist Parties woman with the idea of ethnical cleansing the realm of adverse ethnic groups with the goal of generating an ethnically higher quality state (Win, 2011). The Myanmar Tatmadaw military is forcing individuals to conform by ways of brutality and aggression. The cognition and viewpoints of the different ethnic groups is the margin separating the assemblies. An involvement of exterior unions established a cessation of hostilities back in 2011; however, the Myanmar Tatmadaw armed forces are still persisting in their method of ethnical cleansing by way of murder, rape, and military force (Win, 2011).
Both of these ethnic groups do hold similarities as well as differences when they are compared to one another. When looking at the likeness of the ethnic groups one can see that the foundation of the faiths are the same. The ethnic groups both hold a primarily Buddhist devotion, but there are diminutive portion of the Democratic Karen Buddhist Party that does practice Christianity (KHRG, 2010).
[...] All are expected to conform. The tradition finds its foundation in the ideas of Anawrahta, which was an early Burmese ruler (Win, 2011). The Democratic Karen Buddhist Party also has gained its way of thinking about conformity through principles and taught ideas. This too is a powerful persuasion that holds the basis for many of the assembly's verdicts. Focusing on social perception makes it possible for individuals to obtain techniques for decision-making, outlooks, and religious convictions by way of socialization (Shiraev & Levy, 2010). [...]
[...] The Democratic Karen Buddhist Party contained within the area believes in and desires basic human rights. Nevertheless, this assembly does hold a status of aggression and violent behavior recognized inside the public. The tactics of Myanmar are to generate a standardized social order wherein Buddhism will be the lone religious conviction of individuals within the territory (The Christian Post, 2011). Myanmar Tatmadaw is aspiring to be in command of Burma and will exterminate any person who defies the influence that this assembly has set. [...]
[...] The origin of this civil conflict commenced from the Myanmar Tatmadaw way of thinking. This assembly based its way of thinking upon the actions and beliefs of former leaders (Win, 2011). If the perceptions that the Myanmar Tatmadaw hold of an imperialist empire can be replaced with an outlook of all humans are to be treated as equals the likely outcome would be that the other ethnic groups will be open to compromising. This would be because the assemblies like the Democratic Karen Buddhist Party would not be in fear of their lives and would start to experience some basic human rights from their opposing parties. [...]
[...] Ethnic group conflict Ethnic Group Conflict Within Southeast Asia there is a region called Burma. Throughout this region there is much suffering because of the war waged between the Myanmar Tatmadaw regime and the Democratic Karen Buddhist Party. The individuals who make up the Democratic Karen Buddhist Party are an ethnic assembly who refuse the beliefs and actions of the Myanmar regime. This culture is conducting itself in warfare because of the purpose of seeking a reduction of government control and a more reasonable treatment for their people. [...]
APA Style reference
For your bibliographyOnline reading
with our online readerContent validated
by our reading committee
