Military aviation, as an organization, requires a vast amount of moving parts. Everything from the aircraft themselves, to the people who work on them, fly them, and event the support staff who ensure everyone is being taken care of when it comes to pays, allowances, and other quality of life concerns. The military maintenance staff in particular, is comprised of several different jobs from a variety of experience levels all working to keep the aircraft flying. For this assignment, I would like to focus on the most junior maintenance personnel, those who have the least amount of experience who are there to learn and become qualified before going out to the fleet.
When maintenance personnel graduate from their perspective schools, mechanic, electrician, etc, they are often sent to a training squadron to hone their skills, gain qualifications/certifications and become more experienced before becoming fully operational for a period of two years. The task of training those junior personnel fall onto the more experienced staff who are busy not only training the junior personnel, but who are also busy working on aircraft themselves along with the managerial side of running a department, division, etc. So the more senior a maintenance person gets, the more hectic their life becomes due to all the normal job stressors as well as training those junior to them. Now here's the catch, those who are the most junior are only sent to a training squadron for two years before going to the fleet while the more senior personnel are there for three years or more.
[...] & Schindler, P. (2011). Business Research Methods. Eleventh Edition. McGraw-Hill Irwin: New York , N.Y. [...]
[...] Determine if your hypothesis has adequacy for its purpose, is testable and better than its rivals. Then, use the Checklist for Developing a Strong Hypothesis (Chapter Exhibit as it relates to your hypothesis. Discuss your results. Respond to at least two of your fellow students' postings Military aviation, as an organization, requires a vast amount of moving parts. Everything from the aircraft themselves, to the people who work on them, fly them, and event the support staff who ensure everyone is being taken care of when it comes to pays, allowances, and other quality of life concerns. [...]
[...] The hypothesis clearly identifies facts that are relevant as well as states the conditional variable in terms of meaningfulness to the research problem; two year time limit extended to a three year time for junior personnel. In regard to which research design would be more appropriate for this hypothesis, I believe a predictive study would be more prevalent as described in Cooper & Schindler's text. business research, prediction is found in studies conducted to evaluate specific courses of action or to forecast current and future values” (2011). Lastly, the hypothesis provides a framework for organizing the results into a clear and logical manner as outlined in chapter four. [...]
[...] For this assignment, I would like to focus on the most junior maintenance personnel, those who have the least amount of experience who are there to learn and become qualified before going out to the fleet. When maintenance personnel graduate from their perspective schools, mechanic, electrician, etc, they are often sent to a training squadron to hone their skills, gain qualifications/certifications and become more experienced before becoming fully operational for a period of two years. The task of training those junior personnel fall onto the more experienced staff who are busy not only training the junior personnel, but who are also busy working on aircraft themselves along with the managerial side of running a department, division, etc. [...]
APA Style reference
For your bibliographyOnline reading
with our online readerContent validated
by our reading committee
