In 1926, Hirohito, the grandson of the Meiji emperor, reached the throne and chose Showa ("enlightened Peace") as the official name of his reign. However, the General Tanaka Giichi became Prime Minister in 1927, confirming the dominating role of the army. The fast industrialization of the country involved a strong growth of the production. In front of the insufficiency of its outlets on the domestic market, Japan took back its policy of aggressive expansion with regard to China. Having doubled its population since 1868, Japan argued soon in favour of an extension of space and its resources. That period was deeply marked with a great sense of nationalism. That subject is a very vast one, and leads to the development of many concepts, events, even controversies, and their consequences. Thus, I will first define the contextual background around that period. Then, I will deal with the main conflicts led by Japan which illustrate the expansionism of the country (but I won't depict precisely the battles during the conflicts-only the main facts-, since this essay is not about war strategies but more about the Japanese expansionist ideology and strategy).
[...] Created on November during the first government of Fumimaro Konoe, this organization was known, however, (mainly according to the historian Zhifen Ju) for the system of forced work which it supervised in the conquered territories of China and especially with Manchukuo. According to Ju, the number of civil constrained to slavery in the Japanese mines and industries of these territories were established to approximately 5 million individuals up to 1942 and exceeded 10 million after this date. According to a document found in 2007 by the journalist Reiji Yoshida, the Kôa-In provided funds to the drug traffickers in China to use some parts of the benefits on the opium, heroin and morphine sales to the advantage of the occupation governments of Manchukuo, Nanjing and Mongolia. [...]
[...] role The context which explains the expansionism The ideological background Upset by the treatment granted to their nation by the Western powers at the time of the treaty of Versailles, many politicians and Japanese soldiers like Sadao Araki and Fumimaro Konoe updated the doctrines of the hakko ichi' U (eight corners of the world under only one roof) and settled an ideology based on the superiority of the Nipponese race and its right to dominate Asia. This racist ideology presented Japan as the center of the world and was based on the imperial institution and the emperor, considered as the descendant of the goddess Amaterasu Omikami. [...]
[...] ¶Using this incident to take back to the hostilities, the Japanese army of Manchuria sent troops in the sector, precipitating the release of a new Sino-Japanese war between 1937 and 1945, war which was never officially declared. ¶The Japanese forces invaded the north of China quickly. From the end of 1937, the Japanese navy carried out the blockade of almost the totality of the Chinese coast. ¶The army, at the price of fatal bombardments for the civil populations and a pitiless policy of terror (massacre of Nankin), seized in less than two years almost the total useful China, but did not manage, however, to reduce the guerrilla maintained by the Chinese Communist Party and the Guomindang. [...]
[...] This family is, in consequence, still considered with hostility by many inhabitants of the countries occupied by the Japanese during the war. The crucial question is the one of the effective capacity exerted by the Emperor on the Japanese army during the war. The most commonly allowed version in Japan and in the West until the 1990s presented him as an impotent witness in the political field, marginalized by a all-powerful military staff and warmongers politicians. The debate on the effective role of the Emperor was eluded at the end of the war because the General Mac Arthur, supreme governor of the allied forces, wanted, not only to preserve the imperial institution as a symbol and guarantor of the cohesion of the country, but moreover to ensure himself a flexible collaboration of the imperial person. [...]
[...] But, an agriculture and an industry requiring much workforce and an archaic system of conscription made that the mobilization concerned on the whole, between 1937 and 1945, only 7.4 million Japanese for a population of 70 million inhabitants (by excluding the colonies). II- The main conflicts led by Japan during that period Manchuria At the end of 1920, Japan made of Manchuria a protectorate. On September 18th the Japanese army took over the arsenals of Moukden (Shenyang) and several close cities. [...]
APA Style reference
For your bibliographyOnline reading
with our online readerContent validated
by our reading committee
