From a strictly legal point of view, management is analyzed according to the order of 12 January 1973 on the vocabulary as a neologism from the French language to the English term used to describe management or leadership or management and administration of a company. Returning to a closer theorist's theory on the subject, it was understood as the management action, art or how to conduct an organizing, directing, planning its development, and controlling all areas of activities of the company.
[...] The preponderance of the character before any human management developed by Peters & Waterman is illustrated in the contrast between Taylor and Mayo. The first analyzes the various components of the performance of manual work by timing each movement. For him, the employee, a real cog in the company, can become excellent at a given position if it receives adequate training and above all the premiums. This research demonstrates that no waste is a perfect dehumanization to parallel with the experience of Fordism and his famous line work. [...]
[...] III: Fayol or applicability of management theories to all parts of society Fayol advocated the application of effective management to all parts of society, whether it was commercial, political or even religious. As a leader, its origin is important, one should know and be able to: plan and to plan, organize, command, coordinate and monitor. It is true that this approach is fair enough, but it is possible to attempt to criticize the general simplistic character. Indeed, a pattern of ACC 40 or a national leader of a political party must command his troops. [...]
[...] But the author mainly focuses on the setting of targets by members of management. According to a meaningful analysis, the thinker says loud and clear that privatization is a much-maligned phenomenon these days (see the media about the case GDF and Suez in the autumn of 2006) and has provided a "winning strategy". Indeed "the raison d'être of government is to govern, not to what some unionists would do well to consider. The strength of the theory of Drucker is that he believes that management is at the heart of everyday life, in addition to a core business. [...]
[...] Another thinker in management who has been influenced greatly by Mac Gregor who tried to implement Theory Y is Bennis. Like Maslow, he proves the ineffectiveness of this theory in the absence of a building structure, direction and control of the organization. He draws conclusions and arrived at improving outcomes through the introduction of a leader he compared to a "social architect." Indeed, such a character fills the lack of direction and suffers the Theory Y. According to him, the leader must have "the ability to create a global vision, ( . [...]
APA Style reference
For your bibliographyOnline reading
with our online readerContent validated
by our reading committee
