Stonebreakers - Valerio Ciriaci (2022); George Floyd and the End of American Hegemony - Jonathan Wiesen (2020) - Analyzing the Black Lives Matter Movement

Extract

[...] What reasons/facts does the author provide to support this argument? The author gives many facts to support his argument. For instance, he is citing historical examples of racial injustice in the US, such as the Scottsboro Boys case in the 1930s, in which European intellectuals criticized American racial practices. Even though these intellectuals thought the US was going to change its policies toward people of color, it didn't happen: anti-Black violence is still present today. He also refers to the country recent failures to address crisis, which ultimately led to the decline of its worldwide hegemony and power. [...]

[...] Moreover, they both highlight US history of racism and oppression by taking specific historical examples and facts. The notion of hope is also present in the 2 documents: protesters seem to be the announcement of a new America, maybe more tolerant and understanding. As far as differences are concerned, the conservative side isn't really discussed about in the article while it is an important subject in the movie. What's more, the notion of US hegemony is a major theme in the article, whereas the film barely talks about it. [...]

[...] This failure consequently results in the fall of the country's hegemony worldwide as the US seems unable to address these issues properly. However, the article also highlights the power of the crowd and protesters who want active change and constitute a new hope for the future of America. The quote "Today's racial crisis is different because it is occurring as US hegemony unravels . there is no question that as a global power, the United States is in decline" help us better understand the point of the article as the author is clearly stating the worldwide consequences of the US' refusal to change and acknowledge its racist history. [...]

[...] Explain why you believe it is / they are particularly important. To my mind, the first indigenous protest showcased in the movie is one of the most important scenes. It starts with the intervention of Nick Tilsen, an activist who explains the hardships Indigenous people faced and are still facing today as a result of American colonialism and systemic violence. Then, we assist to a Pacific protest that is against the venue of Trump in the state: Indigenous communities ask to get their lands back. [...]

[...] Or is there anything else that you believe it's important to note regarding this point? Provide at least 1 quote or fact or scene from the film that helps you support your answer. Even though the movie is trying to be neutral by highlighting different stories and opinions from various people, I feel like it is supporting the protesters' side a little bit more. Indeed, the whole film really focuses on their anger and pain. What's more, it portrays the Republicans as terrifying people who perpetuate oppression and don't listen to the mob. [...]