To choose or not to choose

Extract

[...] If God can be influenced by how people or how X acts, then God really ceases to be the omnipotent God. Basically there isn't any real reason to worship him or respect what he has to say. This contradicts the whole essence of who or what God is, and so our first theory fails. The problem with the second scenario is probably a little easier to understand. loves X because X is good.” We have to assume that God is a righteous and pious entity and therefore he can love only good. [...]

[...] To choose or not to choose So now we come to the argument of free will. Do we choose our future? Or do we have a destiny? These two questions exist as the two competing arguments. Some think wholeheartedly one holds the truth, and some say there may be truth in both. These two conflicting views on choice are entitled determinism and libertarianism. Libertarianism in a nutshell states the cause for free will. In this view an individual alone creates his actions and is the sole reason of the cause. [...]

[...] The determinist would say that my decision to throw the baseball came from my liking of the sport of baseball, which came from my dad teaching me baseball, and so on. And this argument is the one still debated. So what holds more water? Both arguments have their obvious strengths. Both have their flaws. The debate will probably continue until all debates come to an end. I tend to lean with the more people-friendly libertarianism. But who knows? Maybe I was predetermined to think that. [...]